Special Courts for Intellectual Property become “Companies Courts”

CategoryCompany and Commercial Law, Commercial and Corporate Law CommentLeave a comment

The Italian Government decree about liberalisation, approved last January 20th, introduced an important modification to the IP Special Courts system.

Article 2 of the Decree has changed the name of IP Special Courts into “Companies Court”, with new and wider jurisdiction. In fact, they will be competent not only for IP issues, but also for all the the disputes involving the more complex type of companies: S.p.A. and S.a.p.a. (two kinds of joint-stock companies).

The new rules will go into effect for all the lawsuit filed 90 days after the publication of the Decree.

Among the Italian territory there are only 12 IP Special Courts.

Microsoft patents the “picture password”

CategoryPatent Law, Patent CommentLeave a comment

It seems they were working on it for a long time: a new PC protection system based on the recognition of a drawing made by user. In other words, instead of  typing the classical alphanumeric password at the computer start, user could choice any picture and literally draw above it up to three sketches to unlock the computer.

For example, you could select a family picture and save a straight line going from a face to another, or a circle around a face, or three short dots above a certain detail, and so on. The exact reproduction of the sketch or of the combinations of sketches over the picture, will unlock the PC. Very ingenious and above all comfortable for all tablet and touch PC users.

The patent, which exact title is “Sketch-based password authentication”, took the number 8,024,775 and has been granted by the U.S. Patent Office on September 20th 2011 upon request filed by Microsoft Corporation on Febraury 20th 2008. The new technology will be embedded on Windows 8, still in beta testing.

On the description of the patent, that includes 16 claims, Microsoft explains that the method extracts a template edge orientation pattern from an initial sketch of the user and an input edge orientation pattern from an input sketch of the user, compares the similarity between the two edge orientation patterns, and makes an authentication decision based on the similarity (and not on the exact match of the drawings, as specified by Microsoft).

Wonderful invention. Now, do we have to wait for any Patent Troll?

From this link an image of Microsoft Picture Password (source: slashgear):

http://cdn.slashgear.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/picturepassword-580×2561.png

Yahoo! sentenced by the Milan Court for copyright law infringement

CategoryConcorrenza, Copyright Law CommentLeave a comment

Sorry, this entry is only available in Italiano.

New Intellectual Property Code

CategoryPatent Law, Concorrenza, Models & Design Law, Trademarks Law, Trademarks CommentLeave a comment

(Italiano) Regolamento di attuazione al Codice della Proprietà Industriale

CategoryPatent Law, Models & Design Law, Trademarks LawTag, CommentLeave a comment

(Italiano) “Made in Italy”: il reato di falsa indicazione si estende anche ai marchi aziendali italiani

CategoryConcorrenza, Trademarks LawTag, Comment1 Comment

Sorry, this entry is only available in Italiano.

Taxes reduction for Comunity Trademarks

CategoryTrademarks Law, Trademarks, UncategorizedTag, CommentLeave a comment

The cost of having a Community trade mark will be cut by 40% to € 900 for online applications from 1 May, the European Commission announced today. OHIM’s President, Wubbo de Boer, speaking at a joint press conference with the European Commissioner for the Internal Market, Charlie McCreevy, said he was delighted that Community trade marks were becoming more accessible and affordable.

Commissioner McCreevy said: “This is good news for businesses in Europe. This will promote entrepreneurship and stimulate economic activity, which is essential in times of economic crisis. In particular, small and medium-sized enterprises, for which the costs and procedure of obtaining this protection are often a heavy burden, will profit from these improvements.”

The move is the second cut in fees in five years, and has been made possible by increased efficiency at OHIM. The process of obtaining a trade mark has been simplified and there has been a strong drive towards doing business online. Over the past five years, the average time taken to register a Community trade mark has dropped by 50% to around eight months.

Winx vs. Witch

CategoryTrademarks Law, TrademarksTag, , , CommentLeave a comment

 winx witch 
The judicial battle between Walt Disney Company Italia S.p.A., owner of the trademark “W.I.T.C.H.”, and Rainbow S.p.A., owner of thre “WINX CLUB” trademark, concluded with the sentence issued by the Civil Court of 

Bologna on August 2 2004, inspired me a semninar at the University of Macerata (among the Intellectual Property Law and Commercial Law course), about the Italian case-law on the matter of trademarks confusion.

Letter of Intent for the distribution of patented products

CategoryPatent Law, Licensing & Distribution ContractsTag, , , , , Comment2 Comments

According to the USA Law of Contracts, as well as for the Italian and European legal system, a Letter of Intent (also known as “Memo Deal”, “Memorandum of understanding”, “Statement of Principles” o “Head of Agreement”) is a pre-contractual legal document that outlines an agreement between two or more parties before the agreement is finalized. Generally a Letter of Intent has an organizing goal and it is not binding upon the parties, having the purpose to clarify the key points of a complex transaction for the convenience of the parties, to declare officially that the parties are currently negotiating, as in a merger or joint venture proposal, or to provide safeguards in case a deal collapses during negotiation.

The Letter of Intent instrument is pretty common for the drawing up of international agreements, above all in the field of IP Law (i.e. transfer, licensing, distribution of patented products), where the parties reached an understanding on the whole (i.e. term, territory, price, products, etc.), but there still are a lot of other conditions to be defined. A Letter of Intent must be followed by a definitive agreement, in order to give efficacy to the entire agreement.

Notwithstanding, in the light of recent judicial sentences, both Italian and foreigner, the simple titling of the document as “Letter of Intent” is not sufficient to totally exclude a binding agreement, in the case the signed document fully expresses the precise willing of the parties, such as a provision immediately effective.

For this reason, and to avoid that the Letter of Intent becomes a binding agreement, it should be expressly specified that the document “is not binding between the parties” and it should be provided a specific clause about the effects the parties want to give to the document.

A Letter of Intent about the distribution of patented products should include the following minimum elements:

  • Statement of not-binding understanding;
  • Description of the products and approximate price (these are better arranged in a exhibit);
  • Term of the definitive agreement;
  • Territory;
  • Exclusivity or not;
  • Warranties of clear and marketable title;
  • Date for definitive agreement signature;
  • Non-competition clause;
  • Confidentiality;
  • Break-up fee.

In case of signature of the definitive agreement as established in the Letter of Intent, the willing of the parties will be transfused in the definitive agreement and consequently the Letter of Intent will lose its effectiveness. Otherwise, in the case the definitive agreement is not signed, according to Italian Civil Law there could be a case of pre-contractual liability (art. 1337 Civil Code), and/or contractual liability in relation to the binding obligations arising from the Letter of Intent. For this reason it is always advisable to establish the applicable Law and Jurisdiction.

Download here a draft of Letter of Intent that I’ve arranged.Icona Word

Privacy simplifications: DPS? No thanks.

CategoryPrivacy LawTag, , CommentLeave a comment

For a long time they have been talking about simplification for the application of the minimum security measures concerning personal data protection.

Finally, through Parliament Act n. 133 dated August 6th 2009, a new subparagraph has been added to article 34 of the Personal Data Protection Code (D. Lgs. 196/2003) according to which an entity that only processes non-sensitive personal data or processes sensitive data that only consist in the health or disease status related to their employees and collaborators (whereby no reference is made to the respective diagnosis), or in their employees’ and collaborators’ membership of trade union organizations, can replace the security policy document (DPS) with a self-executing affidavit signed by the data controller, in pursuance of section 47 of Presidential Decree n. 445 dated December 28th 2000, certifying that the data controller only processes the above mentioned data in compliance with the other security measures provided by the Code.

This amendment will bring a significant relief to most companies, who – as observed by the Italian Privacy Authority too – considered the security policy document as a redundant bureaucratic requirement.

As regards the said processing operations, the Privacy Authority shall determine simplified arrangements to implement the minimum security measures by small companies, professionals and handicrafts.

Download the current Data Protection Code

Download an example of self executing affidavit (Italian)